Baff
Club Member
Just came across this on Bikers Forum
Undertaking or nearside overtaking
I often get asked about undertaking or what is referred to as the nearside overtake. The most common example is usually found on a Motorway when it is clear and we get the centre lane hogger.
Many TV programmes over the years have gone on about it being illegal, but the reality is that nowhere in current traffic law does it say that an undertake is illegal. The reason for this is that apart from the centre lane hogger, congestion is often found close to Motorway slip roads during the rush hour and traffic build up becomes substantial. It is not unusual for lanes 2 and 3 (the centre and outside lanes) to be stationary whilst lane 1 (the left hand lane) remains empty.
If traffic was prohibited from passing along the nearside, then the congestion would be worse than we currently experience. At the same time, (going back to the centre lane hogger) it is not always practical or safe when you are travelling at 70 and someone is doing 50 in lane 2 to go from lane 1 to lane 3, bearing in mind that lane 1 is the normal driving lane.
So is it legal to undertake? Well it is not illegal. The only offence open to the prosecution is either dangerous or careless driving, but to prove these offences it has to be proven beyond all reasonable doubt that the standard of driving fell well below that of a reasonably safe and competent driver, therefore the sole act of a nearside overtake is insufficient. However, weave from lane to lane at high speed, then it may be a different story.
So this raises the question of "What if I decide to undertake and the car in the centre lane decides to move back into the inside lane?"
The driver in the centre lane however does commit the offence of driving without reasonable consideration for other road users (which is a subsection of careless driving), and they also have a statutory duty of care to ensure that it is safe to return to that lane before they actually start to change position.
Now, I am not suggesting for one minute that we all go around undertaking everytime we are on a Motorway, but there are occasions when it is reasonable for a number of reasons, and the courts are now recognising this and have found in favour of riders who have undertaken, where before the rider may have decided against making a claim on the basis that they believed that they committed an offence.
Again, it all comes down to the circumstances and the evidence available.
Undertaking or nearside overtaking
I often get asked about undertaking or what is referred to as the nearside overtake. The most common example is usually found on a Motorway when it is clear and we get the centre lane hogger.
Many TV programmes over the years have gone on about it being illegal, but the reality is that nowhere in current traffic law does it say that an undertake is illegal. The reason for this is that apart from the centre lane hogger, congestion is often found close to Motorway slip roads during the rush hour and traffic build up becomes substantial. It is not unusual for lanes 2 and 3 (the centre and outside lanes) to be stationary whilst lane 1 (the left hand lane) remains empty.
If traffic was prohibited from passing along the nearside, then the congestion would be worse than we currently experience. At the same time, (going back to the centre lane hogger) it is not always practical or safe when you are travelling at 70 and someone is doing 50 in lane 2 to go from lane 1 to lane 3, bearing in mind that lane 1 is the normal driving lane.
So is it legal to undertake? Well it is not illegal. The only offence open to the prosecution is either dangerous or careless driving, but to prove these offences it has to be proven beyond all reasonable doubt that the standard of driving fell well below that of a reasonably safe and competent driver, therefore the sole act of a nearside overtake is insufficient. However, weave from lane to lane at high speed, then it may be a different story.
So this raises the question of "What if I decide to undertake and the car in the centre lane decides to move back into the inside lane?"
The driver in the centre lane however does commit the offence of driving without reasonable consideration for other road users (which is a subsection of careless driving), and they also have a statutory duty of care to ensure that it is safe to return to that lane before they actually start to change position.
Now, I am not suggesting for one minute that we all go around undertaking everytime we are on a Motorway, but there are occasions when it is reasonable for a number of reasons, and the courts are now recognising this and have found in favour of riders who have undertaken, where before the rider may have decided against making a claim on the basis that they believed that they committed an offence.
Again, it all comes down to the circumstances and the evidence available.
